diff options
author | Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com> | 2011-12-03 15:48:29 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> | 2011-12-08 15:23:49 +0000 |
commit | 3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e (patch) | |
tree | 85967d32dd9c02d410739d782b6a4e500a5e0702 /meta/recipes-extended/byacc | |
parent | 558b5043e1d5a36caff137093fd04abcf025af1c (diff) | |
download | openembedded-core-3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e.tar.gz openembedded-core-3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e.tar.bz2 openembedded-core-3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e.tar.xz openembedded-core-3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e.zip |
OECore license fixes: meta/*
This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses
found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas:
- LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked
- LICENSE field has a license with no version
- LICENSE field was actually incorrect
- LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist
This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior
commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional
SPDXLICENSEMAP entries.
HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front.
For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit
That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found
enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at
how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/recipes-extended/byacc')
-rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-extended/byacc/byacc_20110908.bb | 10 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/byacc/byacc_20110908.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/byacc/byacc_20110908.bb index 5969d0abe..5e01c25f7 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-extended/byacc/byacc_20110908.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/byacc/byacc_20110908.bb @@ -1,5 +1,11 @@ -PR = "r0" -LICENSE="other-BSD" +PR = "r1" + +# Sigh. This is one of those places where everyone licenses it differently. Someone +# even apply UCB to it (Free/Net/OpenBSD). The maintainer states that: +# "I've found no reliable source which states that byacc must bear a UCB copyright." +# Setting to PD as this is what the upstream has it as. + +LICENSE="PD" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://package/debian/copyright;md5=4dc4c30f840a7203fb6edf20b3db849e" require byacc.inc |