summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/meta/recipes-extended/byacc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorElizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>2011-12-03 15:48:29 -0800
committerRichard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>2011-12-08 15:23:49 +0000
commit3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e (patch)
tree85967d32dd9c02d410739d782b6a4e500a5e0702 /meta/recipes-extended/byacc
parent558b5043e1d5a36caff137093fd04abcf025af1c (diff)
downloadopenembedded-core-3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e.tar.gz
openembedded-core-3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e.tar.bz2
openembedded-core-3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e.tar.xz
openembedded-core-3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e.zip
OECore license fixes: meta/*
This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas: - LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked - LICENSE field has a license with no version - LICENSE field was actually incorrect - LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional SPDXLICENSEMAP entries. HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front. For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package. Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/recipes-extended/byacc')
-rw-r--r--meta/recipes-extended/byacc/byacc_20110908.bb10
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/byacc/byacc_20110908.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/byacc/byacc_20110908.bb
index 5969d0abe..5e01c25f7 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-extended/byacc/byacc_20110908.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/byacc/byacc_20110908.bb
@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
-PR = "r0"
-LICENSE="other-BSD"
+PR = "r1"
+
+# Sigh. This is one of those places where everyone licenses it differently. Someone
+# even apply UCB to it (Free/Net/OpenBSD). The maintainer states that:
+# "I've found no reliable source which states that byacc must bear a UCB copyright."
+# Setting to PD as this is what the upstream has it as.
+
+LICENSE="PD"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://package/debian/copyright;md5=4dc4c30f840a7203fb6edf20b3db849e"
require byacc.inc