OECore license fixes: meta/*

This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses
found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas:

- LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked
- LICENSE field has a license with no version
- LICENSE field was actually incorrect
- LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist

This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior
commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional
SPDXLICENSEMAP entries.

HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front.
For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see:

https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit

That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found
enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at
how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package.

Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.14.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.14.bb
index 159cb2cf2..26ba78f36 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.14.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.14.bb
@@ -2,11 +2,12 @@ DESCRIPTION = "Highly configurable, modular and secure inetd"
 HOMEPAGE = "http://www.xinetd.org"
 
 # xinetd is a BSD-like license
-LICENSE = "xinetd"
+# Apple and Gentoo say BSD here.
+LICENSE = "BSD"
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYRIGHT;md5=8ad8615198542444f84d28a6cf226dd8"
 
 DEPENDS = ""
-PR ="r0"
+PR ="r1"
 
 SRC_URI = "http://www.xinetd.org/xinetd-${PV}.tar.gz \
       file://xinetd.init \