summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/meta
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'meta')
-rw-r--r--meta/classes/base.bbclass40
-rw-r--r--meta/classes/license.bbclass39
-rw-r--r--meta/classes/package.bbclass17
3 files changed, 69 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
index c8ed5447e..ef9267a12 100644
--- a/meta/classes/base.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
@@ -389,17 +389,43 @@ python () {
dont_want_license = d.getVar('INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE', True)
- if dont_want_license and not pn.endswith("-native") and not pn.endswith("-cross") and not pn.endswith("-cross-initial") and not pn.endswith("-cross-intermediate") and not pn.endswith("-crosssdk-intermediate") and not pn.endswith("-crosssdk") and not pn.endswith("-crosssdk-initial"):
- hosttools_whitelist = (d.getVar('HOSTTOOLS_WHITELIST_%s' % dont_want_license, True) or "").split()
- lgplv2_whitelist = (d.getVar('LGPLv2_WHITELIST_%s' % dont_want_license, True) or "").split()
- dont_want_whitelist = (d.getVar('WHITELIST_%s' % dont_want_license, True) or "").split()
- if pn not in hosttools_whitelist and pn not in lgplv2_whitelist and pn not in dont_want_whitelist:
+ if dont_want_license and not pn.endswith("-native") and not pn.endswith("-cross") and not pn.endswith("-cross-initial") and not pn.endswith("-cross-intermediate") and not pn.endswith("-crosssdk-intermediate") and not pn.endswith("-crosssdk") and not pn.endswith("-crosssdk-initial") and not pn.endswith("-nativesdk"):
+ # Internally, we'll use the license mapping. This way INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE = "GPLv2" and
+ # INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE = "GPLv2.0" will pick up all variations of GPL-2.0
+ spdx_license = return_spdx(d, dont_want_license)
+ hosttools_whitelist = (d.getVar('HOSTTOOLS_WHITELIST_%s' % dont_want_license, True) or d.getVar('HOSTTOOLS_WHITELIST_%s' % spdx_license, True) or "").split()
+ lgplv2_whitelist = (d.getVar('LGPLv2_WHITELIST_%s' % dont_want_license, True) or d.getVar('HOSTTOOLS_WHITELIST_%s' % spdx_license, True) or "").split()
+ dont_want_whitelist = (d.getVar('WHITELIST_%s' % dont_want_license, True) or d.getVar('HOSTTOOLS_WHITELIST_%s' % spdx_license, True) or "").split()
+ if pn not in hosttools_whitelist and pn not in lgplv2_whitelist and pn not in dont_want_whitelist:
this_license = d.getVar('LICENSE', True)
- if incompatible_license(d,dont_want_license):
- bb.note("SKIPPING %s because it's %s" % (pn, this_license))
+ # At this point we know the recipe contains an INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE, however it may contain packages that do not.
+ packages = d.getVar('PACKAGES', True).split()
+ dont_skip_recipe = False
+ skipped_packages = {}
+ unskipped_packages = []
+ for pkg in packages:
+ if incompatible_license(d, dont_want_license, pkg):
+ skipped_packages[pkg] = this_license
+ dont_skip_recipe = True
+ else:
+ unskipped_packages.append(pkg)
+ if not unskipped_packages:
+ # if we hit here and have excluded all packages, then we can just exclude the recipe
+ dont_skip_recipe = False
+ elif skipped_packages and unskipped_packages:
+ for pkg, license in skipped_packages.iteritems():
+ bb.note("SKIPPING the package " + pkg + " at do_rootfs because it's " + this_license)
+ d.setVar('LICENSE_EXCLUSION-' + pkg, 1)
+ for index, pkg in enumerate(unskipped_packages):
+ bb.note("INCLUDING the package " + pkg)
+
+ if dont_skip_recipe is False and incompatible_license(d, dont_want_license):
+ bb.note("SKIPPING recipe %s because it's %s" % (pn, this_license))
raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("incompatible with license %s" % this_license)
+
+
srcuri = d.getVar('SRC_URI', True)
# Svn packages should DEPEND on subversion-native
if "svn://" in srcuri:
diff --git a/meta/classes/license.bbclass b/meta/classes/license.bbclass
index 4b392ceea..eab630e47 100644
--- a/meta/classes/license.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/license.bbclass
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ license_create_manifest() {
INSTALLED_PKGS=`cat ${LICENSE_DIRECTORY}/${IMAGE_NAME}/package.manifest`
# list of installed packages is broken for deb
for pkg in ${INSTALLED_PKGS}; do
- # not the best way to do this but licenses are not arch-dependent iirc
+ # not the best way to do this but licenses are not arch dependant iirc
files=`find ${TMPDIR}/pkgdata/*/runtime -name ${pkg}| head -1`
for filename in $files; do
pkged_pn="$(sed -n 's/^PN: //p' ${filename})"
@@ -135,7 +135,6 @@ license_create_manifest() {
}
-
python do_populate_lic() {
"""
Populate LICENSE_DIRECTORY with licenses.
@@ -254,27 +253,40 @@ python do_populate_lic() {
}
-def incompatible_license(d,dont_want_license):
+def return_spdx(d, license):
+ """
+ This function returns the spdx mapping of a license.
"""
- This function checks if a package has only incompatible licenses. It also take into consideration 'or'
+ if d.getVarFlag('SPDXLICENSEMAP', license) != None:
+ return license
+ else:
+ return d.getVarFlag('SPDXLICENSEMAP', license_type)
+
+def incompatible_license(d, dont_want_license, package=""):
+ """
+ This function checks if a recipe has only incompatible licenses. It also take into consideration 'or'
operand.
"""
import re
import oe.license
from fnmatch import fnmatchcase as fnmatch
-
+ pn = d.getVar('PN', True)
dont_want_licenses = []
dont_want_licenses.append(d.getVar('INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE', True))
- if d.getVarFlag('SPDXLICENSEMAP', dont_want_license):
- dont_want_licenses.append(d.getVarFlag('SPDXLICENSEMAP', dont_want_license))
+ recipe_license = d.getVar('LICENSE', True)
+ if package != "":
+ if d.getVar('LICENSE_' + pn + '-' + package, True):
+ license = d.getVar('LICENSE_' + pn + '-' + package, True)
+ else:
+ license = recipe_license
+ else:
+ license = recipe_license
+ spdx_license = return_spdx(d, dont_want_license)
+ dont_want_licenses.append(spdx_license)
def include_license(license):
if any(fnmatch(license, pattern) for pattern in dont_want_licenses):
return False
- else:
- spdx_license = d.getVarFlag('SPDXLICENSEMAP', license)
- if spdx_license and any(fnmatch(spdx_license, pattern) for pattern in dont_want_licenses):
- return False
else:
return True
@@ -290,16 +302,15 @@ def incompatible_license(d,dont_want_license):
is not a 'X+' license.
"""
if not re.search(r'[+]',dont_want_license):
- licenses=oe.license.flattened_licenses(re.sub(r'[+]', '', d.getVar('LICENSE', True)), choose_licenses)
+ licenses=oe.license.flattened_licenses(re.sub(r'[+]', '', license), choose_licenses)
else:
- licenses=oe.license.flattened_licenses(d.getVar('LICENSE', True), choose_licenses)
+ licenses=oe.license.flattened_licenses(license, choose_licenses)
for onelicense in licenses:
if not include_license(onelicense):
return True
return False
-
def check_license_flags(d):
"""
This function checks if a recipe has any LICENSE_FLAGs that
diff --git a/meta/classes/package.bbclass b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
index bdc4d37af..20af8b791 100644
--- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
@@ -887,15 +887,20 @@ python populate_packages () {
bb.mkdirhier(outdir)
os.chdir(dvar)
- # Sanity check PACKAGES for duplicates - should be moved to
- # sanity.bbclass once we have the infrastucture
+ # Sanity check PACKAGES for duplicates and for LICENSE_EXCLUSION
+ # Sanity should be moved to sanity.bbclass once we have the infrastucture
package_list = []
+
for pkg in packages.split():
- if pkg in package_list:
- bb.error("%s is listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors." % pkg)
+ if d.getVar('LICENSE_EXCLUSION-' + pkg, True):
+ bb.warn("%s has an incompatible license. Excluding from packaging." % pkg)
+ packages.remove(pkg)
else:
- package_list.append(pkg)
-
+ if pkg in package_list:
+ bb.error("%s is listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors." % pkg)
+ else:
+ package_list.append(pkg)
+ d.setVar('PACKAGES', ' '.join(package_list))
pkgdest = d.getVar('PKGDEST', True)
os.system('rm -rf %s' % pkgdest)