| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This implements a feature similar to BBCLASSEXTEND, but for generating
multiple versions of a given recipe. For example: BBVERSIONS = "1.0 2.0 git".
In addition to the above, one can utilize [a-b] style patterns, and can have a
:<basever> postfix, which allows you to essentially name the range of
versions. Both the current version and the basever end up in OVERRIDES, and
the basever gets placed into the BPV variable. The default BPV, if none is
specified, is the original PV of the recipe, before bbversions processing.
In this way, you can do things like:
BBVERSIONS = "1.0.[0-6]:1.0.0+
1.0.[7-9]:1.0.7+"
SRC_URI_append_1.0.7+ = "file://some_extra_patch.patch;patch=1"
Or you can create a recipe per range, and name the recipe file as such: nano_1.0.7+.bb.
(Bitbake rev: 4ee9a56e16f1eb3c1649eaa3127b09ab0e93d1ec)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
??= is a lazy, conditional assignment. Whereas a ?= immediately assigns to
the variable if the variable has not yet been set, ??= does not apply the
default assignment until the end of the parse. As a result, the final ??= for
a given variable is used, as opposed to the first as in ?=.
Note that the initial implementation relies upon finalise() to apply the
defaults, so a "bitbake -e" without specifying a recipe will not show the
defaults as set by ??=. Moving application of the default into getVar adds
too large a performance hit. We may want to revisit this later.
(Bitbake rev: 74f50fbca194c9c72bd2a540f4b9de458cb08e2d)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
base class.
(Bitbake rev: 7ea31b2842b45ffe1ca688f55207f8676442a108)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <clarson@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Evaluate the statements after having parsed one file. This is
referred to as "entwirren" and we can remove the direct evaluation
and postpone a bit, in the future we can use a cached copy instead
of parsing the original.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(Bitbake rev: 9c97696f37499b4d0ec5c034c51e4cf6bc425ba2)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Create the data first, then evaluate on the data dict
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Disable the recursively evaluating the statement for now
as it is causing problems.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
getFunc is now a method of the data node, hopefully we can kill the other
version soon.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(Bitbake rev: 6073a5b8e4ca8af8e1a8e0234fad7b08baf76c99)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
First set of ConfHandling with AST nodes. The include can
use a speed up and things might need to be migrated... into
this class.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When parsing we will collect a number of statements
that can be evaluated...The plan is to be evaluate
things twice (old+new) and then compare the result,
it should be the same.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|