| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
base class.
(Bitbake rev: 7ea31b2842b45ffe1ca688f55207f8676442a108)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <clarson@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Evaluate the statements after having parsed one file. This is
referred to as "entwirren" and we can remove the direct evaluation
and postpone a bit, in the future we can use a cached copy instead
of parsing the original.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(Bitbake rev: 9c97696f37499b4d0ec5c034c51e4cf6bc425ba2)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Create the data first, then evaluate on the data dict
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Disable the recursively evaluating the statement for now
as it is causing problems.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
getFunc is now a method of the data node, hopefully we can kill the other
version soon.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(Bitbake rev: 6073a5b8e4ca8af8e1a8e0234fad7b08baf76c99)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
First set of ConfHandling with AST nodes. The include can
use a speed up and things might need to be migrated... into
this class.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When parsing we will collect a number of statements
that can be evaluated...The plan is to be evaluate
things twice (old+new) and then compare the result,
it should be the same.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
|