Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | conf/machine/include/arm add extra MACHINEOVERRIDES like x86 does | Martin Jansa | 2011-12-13 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| | | | | | | | | | * motivated by this NAK http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/15777/ and today's discussion on #yocto I hope it's worth it to send this RFC Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> | ||||
* | arch-armv6, arch-armv5-dsp: correct endianness confusion | Phil Blundell | 2011-07-29 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5eb needs to be defined in terms of the non-e with the same endianness, i.e. PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5b not PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5, otherwise PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS will end up containing a semi-random mixture of endiannesses and disaster will ensue. Likewise for the vfp and armv6 variants. This is all a bit confusing because TUNE_FEATURES is done the opposite way around, i.e. TUNE_FEATURES_tune-armv5eb is derived by taking the armv5e version and adding bigendian. But fixing that is probably a subject for a separate patch. Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> | ||||
* | Add ARM tune file overhaul based largely on work from Mark Hatle | Richard Purdie | 2011-07-27 | 1 | -0/+32 |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> |