| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
WARNING: QA Issue: tcl-lib: /work/i586-poky-linux/tcl-8.5.11-r4/packages-split/tcl-lib/usr/lib/libtcl8.5.so contains probably-redundant RPATH /usr/lib
WARNING: QA Issue: tcl: /work/i586-poky-linux/tcl-8.5.11-r4/packages-split/tcl/usr/bin/tclsh contains probably-redundant RPATH /usr/lib
WARNING: QA Issue: tcl: /work/i586-poky-linux/tcl-8.5.11-r4/packages-split/tcl/usr/bin/tclsh8.5 contains probably-redundant RPATH /usr/lib
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix an issue in the previous commit:
ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'tcl-native-lib-native' (but virtual:native:/srv/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-slave/nightly/build/meta/recipes-devtools/tcltk/tcl_8.5.11.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
NOTE: Runtime target 'tcl-native-lib-native' is unbuildable, removing.
by replacing ${PN}-lib with tcl-lib
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Include /usr/lib/tcl8 for the msgcat and test module, force dependency on tcl-lib since shlibs isn't picking it up.
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses
found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas:
- LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked
- LICENSE field has a license with no version
- LICENSE field was actually incorrect
- LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist
This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior
commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional
SPDXLICENSEMAP entries.
HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front.
For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit
That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found
enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at
how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
