| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses
found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas:
- LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked
- LICENSE field has a license with no version
- LICENSE field was actually incorrect
- LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist
This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior
commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional
SPDXLICENSEMAP entries.
HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front.
For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit
That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found
enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at
how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we do not disable this then it is enabled sometimes and disabled at
others depending on whether bzip2 has been built at the time, and worst
case it will cause a race condition if bzip2 is building at the same
time.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
|
freetype-2.4.6/docs/LICENSE.TXT changed a little to describe more clearly
the compatibility about FreeTypeLicense and GPLv2+, but the actual license
remains unchanged: it's still LICENSE = "FreeTypeLicense | GPLv2+".
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <dexuan.cui@intel.com>
|
