| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some remotes can use HTTPS and we don't need to check the certificate
of the host so wget call is changed to avoid it.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently it is difficult to know if a pull request is being sent for review
or just to be pulled.
Add a -c argument to add RFC to the subject prefix and a blurb requesting
review to the cover letter.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@intel.com>
Cc: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rather than requiring users to have public remotes and private remotes when
their development remotes are ssh based (and therefor unsuitable for a pull
request URL), rewrite the ones we know about from ssh://git@ to git://.
As the remote url vary from remote to remote, do the REMOTE_REPO regex per
remote.
With this infrastructure in place, future patches can augment the list of
known remotes for things like Git Hub, Gitorious, kernel.org, etc.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Acked-by: Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>
Cc: Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>
Cc: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allow for arbitrary remotes via a new -u argument. Remove the hard coded
references to the pokylinux repositories. Create the WEB_URL from known
remotes. Future patches can add additional WEB_URL mappings for remotes
like Git Hub, Gitorious, and kernel.org.
Rather than duplicating the git request-pull command ourselves, just use
the existing one.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Acked-by: Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>
Cc: Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>
Cc: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Indent with tabs, not spaces, to be consistent with other bash scripts.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some initial cleanup prior to a significant overhaul.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The previous create-pull-request only generated a cover letter. When used to
send to the list, it did not include the patches, which made it difficult
to perform peer review. A pull request without patches is typically only sent
by a maintainer. As we are not all maintainers, we need a means to easily
submit patches for review.
As we are accustomed to making pull requests, this script retains a
git-pull-style cover letter, while sending the relevant patches as responses
to the pull. This will provide the necessary context for peer review, and still
allow people to collapse threads and see no more mail than they were previously.
This version retains the relative_to, commit_id, and contrib_branch arguments
from the original, along with their default values. It adds several more,
resulting in a highly flexible tool.
The script creates a pull directory (pull-$$ by default, configurable via the -o
option) and populates it with a git-format-patch generated patch series and
cover letter. The cover letter is modified to include the git and http pull URLs
and branch name, as well as a basic signature from the author pulled from git's
user.name and user.email config. git-format-patch provides the shortlog and
diffstat of the series.
Breaking a bit from the original, this script maintains the [PATCH] subject
prefix in the cover letter (as opposed to [GIT PULL]. This is better suited to
the majority of developers (who are not maintainers). This prefix is
configurable with the -p option, allowing you to create an [RFC PATCH]
prefix, for example.
By default, the generated cover letter with contain "*** SUBJECT HERE ***" and
"*** BLURB HERE ***" tokens which you should replace with something
appropriate prior to sending the messages.
When developing multiple versions of a patch series, it can save time to
maintain a message.txt file, rather than having to retype the message body of
the cover letter every time. The -m option allows you to specify a message file
and replace the "*** BLURB HERE ***" token of the cover letter with the contents
of the message file.
Finally, the -s option will replace the "*** SUBJECT HERE ***" token in the cover
letter with the specified subject.
The generated patches are suitable for sending via sendmail.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
CC: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
CC: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
CC: Saul Wold <saul.wold@intel.com>
CC: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The patches to follow completely rewrite the existing create-pull-request.
Rather than have an initial diff of the two files (which are not at all
similar) remove the original, and then create the new one.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
CC: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
CC: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
CC: Saul Wold <saul.wold@intel.com>
CC: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this change the create_pull_request will be able to generate pull
requests to master as well as distro/master branch.
Some documentation is added in the Usage messange of the script.
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
|
|
|
This is the 1st version of create-pull-request script.
Using specified local commit-id or branch-name it
generates a short description of the changes;
and using poky-contrib branch-name it generates the
URL where these changes are already pushed
and are available for review and git-pull.
I prepared this script as per the input from Richard Purdie.
Signed-Off-By: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
|
