From ad52eacebdc413aa351de078ee878182a9c71e16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Saul Wold Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:23:32 -0700 Subject: gnutls: update to 2.12.5 Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- .../gnutls/gnutls-2.10.4/gnutls-texinfo-euro.patch | 18 ------------------ 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls-2.10.4/gnutls-texinfo-euro.patch (limited to 'meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls-2.10.4/gnutls-texinfo-euro.patch') diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls-2.10.4/gnutls-texinfo-euro.patch b/meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls-2.10.4/gnutls-texinfo-euro.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 10e377407..000000000 --- a/meta/recipes-support/gnutls/gnutls-2.10.4/gnutls-texinfo-euro.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,18 +0,0 @@ -Upstream-Status: Backport - -The version of texinfo in Debian Sarge does not understand the @euro{} command. -This patch replaces the @euro{} command with the word "euro". - ---- gnutls-1.3.5/doc/gnutls.texi.orig 2006-04-26 08:06:40.918268000 +0930 -+++ gnutls-1.3.5/doc/gnutls.texi 2006-04-26 08:06:52.446515440 +0930 -@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ - long as it is difficult enough to generate two different messages with - the same hash algorithm output. In that case the same signature could - be used as a proof for both messages. Nobody wants to sign an innocent --message of donating 1 @euro{} to Greenpeace and find out that he --donated 1.000.000 @euro{} to Bad Inc. -+message of donating 1 euro to Greenpeace and find out that he -+donated 1.000.000 euro to Bad Inc. - - For a hash algorithm to be called cryptographic the following three - requirements must hold -- cgit v1.2.3