From f0fd28a66ca5866de557941113b35de5b55b554d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zwelch Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:03:59 +0000 Subject: David Brownell : Warn when people (or scripts) use numeric identifiers for TAPs, instead of dotted.name values. We want this usage to go away, so that for example adding more TAPs doesn't cause config scripts to break because some sequence number changed. It's been deprecated since late 2008, but putting a warning on this should help us remove it (say, in June 2010) by helping to phase out old (ab)usage in config scripts. Other than in various config files, the only code expecting such a number was the almost unused str9xpec driver. This code was changed to use the TAP it was passed, instead of making its own dubious lookup and ignoring that TAP. git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@2415 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60 --- src/flash/str9xpec.c | 8 ++++---- src/jtag/core.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ src/jtag/jtag.h | 1 - 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) (limited to 'src') diff --git a/src/flash/str9xpec.c b/src/flash/str9xpec.c index c1021ba0..bca3b88f 100644 --- a/src/flash/str9xpec.c +++ b/src/flash/str9xpec.c @@ -318,14 +318,14 @@ static int str9xpec_flash_bank_command(struct command_context_s *cmd_ctx, char * str9xpec_info = malloc(sizeof(str9xpec_flash_controller_t)); bank->driver_priv = str9xpec_info; - /* find out jtag position of flash controller - * it is always after the arm966 core */ - + /* REVISIT verify that the jtag position of flash controller is + * right after *THIS* core, which must be a STR9xx core ... + */ armv4_5 = bank->target->arch_info; arm7_9 = armv4_5->arch_info; jtag_info = &arm7_9->jtag_info; - str9xpec_info->tap = jtag_tap_by_position(jtag_info->tap->abs_chain_position - 1); + str9xpec_info->tap = bank->target->tap; str9xpec_info->isc_enable = 0; str9xpec_build_block_list(bank); diff --git a/src/jtag/core.c b/src/jtag/core.c index 651e6545..c721b91b 100644 --- a/src/jtag/core.c +++ b/src/jtag/core.c @@ -162,10 +162,22 @@ void jtag_tap_add(struct jtag_tap_s *t) *tap = t; } +/* returns a pointer to the n-th device in the scan chain */ +static inline jtag_tap_t *jtag_tap_by_position(unsigned n) +{ + jtag_tap_t *t = jtag_all_taps(); + + while (t && n-- > 0) + t = t->next_tap; + + return t; +} + jtag_tap_t *jtag_tap_by_string(const char *s) { /* try by name first */ jtag_tap_t *t = jtag_all_taps(); + while (t) { if (0 == strcmp(t->dotted_name, s)) @@ -178,7 +190,16 @@ jtag_tap_t *jtag_tap_by_string(const char *s) if (parse_uint(s, &n) != ERROR_OK) return NULL; - return jtag_tap_by_position(n); + /* FIXME remove this numeric fallback code late June 2010, along + * with all info in the User's Guide that TAPs have numeric IDs. + * Also update "scan_chain" output to not display the numbers. + */ + t = jtag_tap_by_position(n); + if (t) + LOG_WARNING("Specify TAP '%s' by name, not number %u", + t->dotted_name, n); + + return t; } jtag_tap_t *jtag_tap_by_jim_obj(Jim_Interp *interp, Jim_Obj *o) @@ -192,17 +213,6 @@ jtag_tap_t *jtag_tap_by_jim_obj(Jim_Interp *interp, Jim_Obj *o) return t; } -/* returns a pointer to the n-th device in the scan chain */ -jtag_tap_t *jtag_tap_by_position(unsigned n) -{ - jtag_tap_t *t = jtag_all_taps(); - - while (t && n-- > 0) - t = t->next_tap; - - return t; -} - jtag_tap_t* jtag_tap_next_enabled(jtag_tap_t* p) { p = p ? p->next_tap : jtag_all_taps(); diff --git a/src/jtag/jtag.h b/src/jtag/jtag.h index 1564ca65..7cdaa51f 100644 --- a/src/jtag/jtag.h +++ b/src/jtag/jtag.h @@ -185,7 +185,6 @@ extern jtag_tap_t* jtag_all_taps(void); extern const char *jtag_tap_name(const jtag_tap_t *tap); extern jtag_tap_t* jtag_tap_by_string(const char* dotted_name); extern jtag_tap_t* jtag_tap_by_jim_obj(Jim_Interp* interp, Jim_Obj* obj); -extern jtag_tap_t* jtag_tap_by_position(unsigned abs_position); extern jtag_tap_t* jtag_tap_next_enabled(jtag_tap_t* p); extern unsigned jtag_tap_count_enabled(void); extern unsigned jtag_tap_count(void); -- cgit v1.2.3