From 04b514707f221ba00ae789e69f6f8047af96125d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Brownell Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:22:36 -0800 Subject: target: remove unused "bitfield" infrastructure We have too many different registers, and too many version and context dependent interpretations, for this type of bitfield management to be scalable. (Anyone who really wants bitfield interpretation *can* do that in Tcl code...) There are ... quite a few copies of the same ARM dummy registers. There should eventually be one copy; this many is craziness. Signed-off-by: David Brownell --- src/target/xscale.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/target/xscale.c') diff --git a/src/target/xscale.c b/src/target/xscale.c index ca3ea2ae..10ccf5dd 100644 --- a/src/target/xscale.c +++ b/src/target/xscale.c @@ -2849,8 +2849,6 @@ static void xscale_build_reg_cache(struct target *target) (*cache_p)->reg_list[i].dirty = 0; (*cache_p)->reg_list[i].valid = 0; (*cache_p)->reg_list[i].size = 32; - (*cache_p)->reg_list[i].bitfield_desc = NULL; - (*cache_p)->reg_list[i].num_bitfields = 0; (*cache_p)->reg_list[i].arch_info = &arch_info[i]; (*cache_p)->reg_list[i].arch_type = xscale_reg_arch_type; arch_info[i] = xscale_reg_arch_info[i]; -- cgit v1.2.3