From 52a788e008ecf0ca6156f02de08a0f062d49a236 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Brownell Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:56:17 -0700 Subject: remove more duplication Not sure how the original "move code to adi_v5_swd.c" patch left some code in the "arm_adi_v5.c" file, but a recent patch was only a partial fix -- it didn't remove all the duplication. Signed-off-by: David Brownell --- src/target/arm_adi_v5.c | 25 ------------------------- 1 file changed, 25 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/target') diff --git a/src/target/arm_adi_v5.c b/src/target/arm_adi_v5.c index 4afd50cb..01c274b3 100644 --- a/src/target/arm_adi_v5.c +++ b/src/target/arm_adi_v5.c @@ -1572,28 +1572,3 @@ const struct command_registration dap_command_handlers[] = { }; -/* - * This represents the bits which must be sent out on TMS/SWDIO to - * switch a DAP implemented using an SWJ-DP module into SWD mode. - * These bits are stored (and transmitted) LSB-first. - * - * See the DAP-Lite specification, section 2.2.5 for information - * about making the debug link select SWD or JTAG. (Similar info - * is in a few other ARM documents.) - */ -static const uint8_t jtag2swd_bitseq[] = { - /* More than 50 TCK/SWCLK cycles with TMS/SWDIO high, - * putting both JTAG and SWD logic into reset state. - */ - 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, - /* Switching sequence enables SWD and disables JTAG - * NOTE: bits in the DP's IDCODE may expose the need for - * an old/deprecated sequence (0xb6 0xed). - */ - 0x9e, 0xe7, - /* More than 50 TCK/SWCLK cycles with TMS/SWDIO high, - * putting both JTAG and SWD logic into reset state. - */ - 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, -}; - -- cgit v1.2.3