diff options
| author | oharboe <oharboe@b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60> | 2009-08-26 08:32:03 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | oharboe <oharboe@b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60> | 2009-08-26 08:32:03 +0000 |
| commit | 9a9ebfb924553e0f4837c4ef77b900f1f5d824f1 (patch) | |
| tree | 760ffc1a95e45f3fe67fa021616ee8e308136dec | |
| parent | 11856bcffc9a35c3844df71a3a9641f5cf8beb6b (diff) | |
| download | openocd_libswd-9a9ebfb924553e0f4837c4ef77b900f1f5d824f1.tar.gz openocd_libswd-9a9ebfb924553e0f4837c4ef77b900f1f5d824f1.tar.bz2 openocd_libswd-9a9ebfb924553e0f4837c4ef77b900f1f5d824f1.tar.xz openocd_libswd-9a9ebfb924553e0f4837c4ef77b900f1f5d824f1.zip | |
reduce arm11 output noise
git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@2628 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60
| -rw-r--r-- | TODO | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | src/jtag/core.c | 7 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | src/jtag/jtag.h | 3 |
3 files changed, 11 insertions, 4 deletions
@@ -117,7 +117,10 @@ https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-July/009206.html - ARM923EJS: - reset run/halt/step is not robust; needs testing to map out problems. - ARM11 improvements (MB?) - - fix single stepping (reported by ØH) + - fix single stepping (reported by ØH). Michael Bruck explained + that what's required is to emulate the current instruction(just like the + arm7 code) to know what address to set the breakpoint at for single + stepping an instruction. - implement missing functionality (grep FNC_INFO_NOTIMPLEMENTED ...) - Cortex A8 support (ML) - add target implementation (ML) diff --git a/src/jtag/core.c b/src/jtag/core.c index d278c96b..8cb4da55 100644 --- a/src/jtag/core.c +++ b/src/jtag/core.c @@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ static bool jtag_examine_chain_match_tap(const struct jtag_tap_s *tap) /* If none of the expected ids matched, log an error */ if (ii != tap->expected_ids_cnt) { - LOG_INFO("JTAG Tap/device matched"); + LOG_DEBUG("JTAG Tap/device matched"); return true; } jtag_examine_chain_display(LOG_LVL_ERROR, "got", @@ -978,11 +978,13 @@ int jtag_examine_chain(void) for (unsigned bit_count = 0; bit_count < (JTAG_MAX_CHAIN_SIZE * 32) - 31;) { uint32_t idcode = buf_get_u32(idcode_buffer, bit_count, 32); + tap->hasidcode = true; if ((idcode & 1) == 0) { /* LSB must not be 0, this indicates a device in bypass */ LOG_WARNING("Tap/Device does not have IDCODE"); idcode = 0; + tap->hasidcode = false; bit_count += 1; } @@ -1074,7 +1076,8 @@ int jtag_validate_chain(void) } val = buf_get_u32(ir_test, chain_pos, 2); - if (val != 0x1) + /* Only fail this check if we have IDCODE for this device */ + if ((val != 0x1)&&(tap->hasidcode)) { char *cbuf = buf_to_str(ir_test, total_ir_length, 16); LOG_ERROR("Could not validate JTAG scan chain, IR mismatch, scan returned 0x%s. tap=%s pos=%d expected 0x1 got %0x", cbuf, jtag_tap_name(tap), chain_pos, val); diff --git a/src/jtag/jtag.h b/src/jtag/jtag.h index 37a90b19..3e3686b8 100644 --- a/src/jtag/jtag.h +++ b/src/jtag/jtag.h @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ typedef struct jtag_tap_event_action_s jtag_tap_event_action_t; /* this is really: typedef jtag_tap_t */ /* But - the typedef is done in "types.h" */ -/* due to "forward decloration reasons" */ +/* due to "forward declaration reasons" */ struct jtag_tap_s { const char* chip; @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ struct jtag_tap_s uint32_t ir_capture_mask; uint8_t* expected_mask; /**< Capture-IR expected mask */ uint32_t idcode; + bool hasidcode; /* not all devices have idcode, we'll discover this during chain examination */ /**< device identification code */ /// Array of expected identification codes */ |