diff options
author | oharboe <oharboe@b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60> | 2009-08-27 10:37:01 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | oharboe <oharboe@b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60> | 2009-08-27 10:37:01 +0000 |
commit | ae17ce23eb7bf4c0892c609f0a49daa8cd63d8c5 (patch) | |
tree | bad95dad4947cd9d0ddb621c612ce7a34f4bb111 | |
parent | c5145ceb199a004ef7d2c9a2ba74393756c61006 (diff) | |
download | openocd_libswd-ae17ce23eb7bf4c0892c609f0a49daa8cd63d8c5.tar.gz openocd_libswd-ae17ce23eb7bf4c0892c609f0a49daa8cd63d8c5.tar.bz2 openocd_libswd-ae17ce23eb7bf4c0892c609f0a49daa8cd63d8c5.tar.xz openocd_libswd-ae17ce23eb7bf4c0892c609f0a49daa8cd63d8c5.zip |
arm11 hardware step using simulation + breakpoint. Use "hardware_step enable" command to revert to hardware stepping. Ideally we could retire the "hardware_step enable" command once we no longer believe it to be necessary.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@2643 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60
-rw-r--r-- | NEWS | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/target/arm11.c | 47 |
2 files changed, 30 insertions, 20 deletions
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ Target Layer: "cortex_m3 vector_catch" ... traps certain hardware faults without tying up breakpoint resources If you're willing to help debug it: VERY EARLY Cortex-A8 support - New commands for use with XScale processors: "xscale vector_table" + New commands for use with XScale processors: "xscale vector_table" + ARM11 single stepping support for i.MX31 Flash Layer: The lpc2000 driver handles the new NXP LPC1700 (Cortex-M3) chips diff --git a/src/target/arm11.c b/src/target/arm11.c index 0af46d5c..7f92ce47 100644 --- a/src/target/arm11.c +++ b/src/target/arm11.c @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ bool arm11_config_memwrite_error_fatal = true; uint32_t arm11_vcr = 0; bool arm11_config_memrw_no_increment = false; bool arm11_config_step_irq_enable = false; +bool arm11_config_hardware_step = false; #define ARM11_HANDLER(x) \ .x = arm11_##x @@ -976,7 +977,6 @@ static int arm11_simulate_step(target_t *target, uint32_t *dry_run_pc) int arm11_step(struct target_s *target, int current, uint32_t address, int handle_breakpoints) { FNC_INFO; - int retval; LOG_DEBUG("target->state: %s", target_state_name(target)); @@ -995,15 +995,6 @@ int arm11_step(struct target_s *target, int current, uint32_t address, int handl LOG_DEBUG("STEP PC %08" PRIx32 "%s", R(PC), !current ? "!" : ""); - /* TODO: to implement single stepping on arm11 devices that can't - * do single stepping in hardware we need to calculate the next - * pc and set up breakpoints accordingingly. */ - uint32_t next_pc; - retval = arm11_simulate_step(target, &next_pc); - if (retval != ERROR_OK) - return retval; - - /** \todo TODO: Thumb not supported here */ uint32_t next_instruction; @@ -1047,10 +1038,30 @@ int arm11_step(struct target_s *target, int current, uint32_t address, int handl brp[0].write = 1; brp[0].address = ARM11_SC7_BVR0; - brp[0].value = R(PC); brp[1].write = 1; brp[1].address = ARM11_SC7_BCR0; - brp[1].value = 0x1 | (3 << 1) | (0x0F << 5) | (0 << 14) | (0 << 16) | (0 << 20) | (2 << 21); + + if (arm11_config_hardware_step) + { + /* hardware single stepping be used if possible or is it better to + * always use the same code path? Hardware single stepping is not supported + * on all hardware + */ + brp[0].value = R(PC); + brp[1].value = 0x1 | (3 << 1) | (0x0F << 5) | (0 << 14) | (0 << 16) | (0 << 20) | (2 << 21); + } else + { + /* sets a breakpoint on the next PC(calculated by simulation), + */ + uint32_t next_pc; + int retval; + retval = arm11_simulate_step(target, &next_pc); + if (retval != ERROR_OK) + return retval; + + brp[0].value = next_pc; + brp[1].value = 0x1 | (3 << 1) | (0x0F << 5) | (0 << 14) | (0 << 16) | (0 << 20) | (0 << 21); + } CHECK_RETVAL(arm11_sc7_run(arm11, brp, asizeof(brp))); @@ -1102,11 +1113,6 @@ int arm11_step(struct target_s *target, int current, uint32_t address, int handl CHECK_RETVAL(target_call_event_callbacks(target, TARGET_EVENT_HALTED)); - if (R(PC) != next_pc) - { - LOG_WARNING("next pc != simulated address %08" PRIx32 "!=%08" PRIx32, R(PC), next_pc); - } - return ERROR_OK; } @@ -1908,6 +1914,7 @@ BOOL_WRAPPER(memwrite_burst, "memory write burst mode") BOOL_WRAPPER(memwrite_error_fatal, "fatal error mode for memory writes") BOOL_WRAPPER(memrw_no_increment, "\"no increment\" mode for memory transfers") BOOL_WRAPPER(step_irq_enable, "IRQs while stepping") +BOOL_WRAPPER(hardware_step, "hardware single step") int arm11_handle_vcr(struct command_context_s *cmd_ctx, char *cmd, char **args, int argc) { @@ -2070,8 +2077,10 @@ int arm11_register_commands(struct command_context_s *cmd_ctx) RC_FINAL_BOOL("no_increment", "Don't increment address on multi-read/-write (default: disabled)", memrw_no_increment) - RC_FINAL_BOOL("step_irq_enable", "Enable interrupts while stepping (default: disabled)", - step_irq_enable) +RC_FINAL_BOOL("step_irq_enable", "Enable interrupts while stepping (default: disabled)", + step_irq_enable) +RC_FINAL_BOOL("hardware_step", "hardware single stepping. By default use simulate + breakpoint. This command is only here to check if simulate + breakpoint implementation is broken.", + hardware_step) RC_FINAL("vcr", "Control (Interrupt) Vector Catch Register", arm11_handle_vcr) |