summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorØyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>2010-09-21 22:13:09 +0200
committerØyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>2010-09-21 22:17:38 +0200
commitcb0de21d0cb6b899be30b6ce9c48d93f75a6c345 (patch)
treef5c8be184e9371f8aa662970b212287f769acd4a
parent22911a3aedfa01c7a5643de9c21fbb94f6219c38 (diff)
downloadopenocd_libswd-cb0de21d0cb6b899be30b6ce9c48d93f75a6c345.tar.gz
openocd_libswd-cb0de21d0cb6b899be30b6ce9c48d93f75a6c345.tar.bz2
openocd_libswd-cb0de21d0cb6b899be30b6ce9c48d93f75a6c345.tar.xz
openocd_libswd-cb0de21d0cb6b899be30b6ce9c48d93f75a6c345.zip
jtagdp: remove #if 0'd kludges and explain why the code is correct
short story: if the JTAG clock is too high, then the behavior will be flaky and kludging the code may seem to make things beter, but really it's just a red herring. Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
-rw-r--r--src/target/adi_v5_jtag.c40
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/src/target/adi_v5_jtag.c b/src/target/adi_v5_jtag.c
index 8731a1a0..48b4a7b8 100644
--- a/src/target/adi_v5_jtag.c
+++ b/src/target/adi_v5_jtag.c
@@ -191,22 +191,30 @@ static int jtagdp_transaction_endcheck(struct adiv5_dap *dap)
/* too expensive to call keep_alive() here */
-#if 0
- /* Danger!!!! BROKEN!!!! */
- adi_jtag_scan_inout_check_u32(dap, JTAG_DP_DPACC,
- DP_CTRL_STAT, DPAP_READ, 0, &ctrlstat);
- /* Danger!!!! BROKEN!!!! Why will jtag_execute_queue() fail here????
- R956 introduced the check on return value here and now Michael Schwingen reports
- that this code no longer works....
-
- https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2008-September/003107.html
- */
- if ((retval = jtag_execute_queue()) != ERROR_OK)
- {
- LOG_ERROR("BUG: Why does this fail the first time????");
- }
- /* Why??? second time it works??? */
-#endif
+ /* Here be dragons!
+ *
+ * It is easy to be in a JTAG clock range where the target
+ * is not operating in a stable fashion. This happens
+ * for a few reasons:
+ *
+ * - the user may construct a simple test case to try to see
+ * if a higher JTAG clock works to eke out more performance.
+ * This simple case may pass, but more complex situations can
+ * fail.
+ *
+ * - The mostly works JTAG clock rate and the complete failure
+ * JTAG clock rate may be as much as 2-4x apart. This seems
+ * to be especially true on RC oscillator driven parts.
+ *
+ * So: even if calling adi_jtag_scan_inout_check_u32() multiple
+ * times here seems to "make things better here", it is just
+ * hiding problems with too high a JTAG clock.
+ *
+ * Note that even if some parts have RCLK/RTCK, that doesn't
+ * mean that RCLK/RTCK is the *correct* rate to run the JTAG
+ * interface at, i.e. RCLK/RTCK rates can be "too high", especially
+ * before the RC oscillator phase is not yet complete.
+ */
/* Post CTRL/STAT read; discard any previous posted read value
* but collect its ACK status.