summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tcl/cpu/arm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>2009-11-13 13:44:50 -0800
committerDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>2009-11-13 13:44:50 -0800
commit38e8d60f79fd51424c556e07653713254c2d9b4e (patch)
treeec0b8cea908e83bd369f59024e96e0c73d0469a2 /tcl/cpu/arm
parentafe0298399bd06700926822e6d49c5bc44151956 (diff)
downloadopenocd_libswd-38e8d60f79fd51424c556e07653713254c2d9b4e.tar.gz
openocd_libswd-38e8d60f79fd51424c556e07653713254c2d9b4e.tar.bz2
openocd_libswd-38e8d60f79fd51424c556e07653713254c2d9b4e.tar.xz
openocd_libswd-38e8d60f79fd51424c556e07653713254c2d9b4e.zip
target.cfg: label ETBs correctly
Various cores with an ETB have its TAP misnamed ... either as a boundary scan TAP or as the iMX "Secure JTAG Controller" (which is, among other things, a JRC that could be used to shorten scan chains). Use the correct name for these TAPs, which we can recognize since their IDs were assigned by ARM and these chips all document the presence of an ETB. The 0x2b900f0f is ETB11; the 0x1b900f0f is an older module, just called "ETB". Also shrink the ETB's IR configuration; the default IR-Capture value is fine, and the mask can specify that all four bits are safe to check (per ARM documentation). Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tcl/cpu/arm')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions